2019
Chia, Aleena
The Moral Calculus of Vocational Passion in Digital Gaming
In: Television & New Media, vol. 20, iss. 8, pp. 767-777, 2019, ISSN: 1527-4764.
Journal article
Abstract | Links | Tags: Digital games, Digital labor, Hobbies, New economy, Passionate work
@article{Chia2019,
title = {The Moral Calculus of Vocational Passion in Digital Gaming},
author = {Aleena Chia},
doi = {10.1177/1527476419851079},
issn = {1527-4764},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-05-23},
journal = {Television & New Media},
volume = {20},
issue = {8},
pages = {767-777},
abstract = {The desire to “do what you love” energizes employment and engagement in creative industries such as digital gaming yet drains hobbyists and aspirants by normalizing expectations to sacrifice job security for passionate work. This article investigates how individuals regulate their aspirations through taken-for-granted trade-offs between vocational compromise and compensation. Multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork with players at fan conventions and recruitment events in North America suggests a moral calculus of corruption and sublimation between passion and profit, which can be traced back to industrialization’s cleavage of labor from recreation and its institution of hobbies as productive leisure. Building on existing research about waged labor’s imagined denigration of hobbies, this argument juxtaposes the passion that is corruptible by work and the passion that promises to sublimate work from drudgery. Interrogating this confounding logic cultivates counter-narratives for purposeful livelihoods beyond industrial-era notions of productivity and neoliberal notions of passion.},
keywords = {Digital games, Digital labor, Hobbies, New economy, Passionate work},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The desire to “do what you love” energizes employment and engagement in creative industries such as digital gaming yet drains hobbyists and aspirants by normalizing expectations to sacrifice job security for passionate work. This article investigates how individuals regulate their aspirations through taken-for-granted trade-offs between vocational compromise and compensation. Multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork with players at fan conventions and recruitment events in North America suggests a moral calculus of corruption and sublimation between passion and profit, which can be traced back to industrialization’s cleavage of labor from recreation and its institution of hobbies as productive leisure. Building on existing research about waged labor’s imagined denigration of hobbies, this argument juxtaposes the passion that is corruptible by work and the passion that promises to sublimate work from drudgery. Interrogating this confounding logic cultivates counter-narratives for purposeful livelihoods beyond industrial-era notions of productivity and neoliberal notions of passion.